Difference between a Gerund and a Present Participle

-

Both a gerund and a present participle come from a verb, and both end in –ing. However, each has a different function.  A gerund acts like a noun while a present participle acts like a verb or adjective.


Trekking is fun!


Trekking can be a gerund or a present participle.



When trekking is a gerund, it acts like a noun. 

It can be a subject, an object, the object of a preposition, or a subject complement.

 


Trekking is a long walk on the mountains.   [trekking= subject]


I love trekking.    [trekking= object ]

I am excited by trekking.   [trekking= object of a preposition]


One popular adventure is trekking.   [trekking= subject complement]



When trekking is a present participle, it is part of a continuous verb tense.

 

Right now, they are trekking through mountain forests.   [are trekking= present continuous]    


He was trekking yesterday afternoon.   [was trekking= past continuous]


Tomorrow, my friends and I are going to be trekking.   [are going to be trekking = future continuous]                                                        


Unlike a gerund, a present participle can act like an adjective that modifies a noun or follows the be verb.

Example: exciting


The word exciting is a present participle used as an adjective to modify a noun or to follow the verb to be.


The exciting sport made the people scream.   [adjective + noun]


People enjoyed the exciting game.   [adjective + noun]


The game is exciting. [be verb + adjective]

 

 Look at the sentences below. Decide whether the underlined –ing word is acting like a noun, part of a verb, or an adjective.  


1.What an amazing movie! I want to watch it again!

2. Speaking English well takes a long time.

3. He cares about getting a good job.

4. Shh! I am trying to sleep.

5. My friends and I were sitting in a café and talking.

6. The directions were very confusing.

7. They have been studying for a long time and want to take a break.

8. She loves travelling.


Answers: 1) adjective, 2) gerund, 3) gerund, 4) verb, 5) verb & verb, 6) adjective, 7) verb, 8) gerund

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Rasa Theory in Kalidasa’s Abhijnanashakuntalam

-
 (A comprehensive research paper presented by Ashwin, Roll No. 202554) Introduction to Rasa Theory   Bharata Muni’s ‘Rasa’ theory initially originated in his Sanskrit treatise written on the performing arts-Natyashastra. According to the Natyashastra, the goals of theatre and its elements are to empower aesthetic experience and deliver emotional rasa. It has its roots in the Vedic period, in Rig Veda as well as Atharvaveda. The theory advocates that entertainment is the desired effect of performance arts but not the primary goal, and the primary goal is to transport the individuals present in the audience into another parallel reality, full of wonder and bliss, where he/she experiences the essence of his/her consciousness and reflects on spiritual and moral aspects. It suggests that every object and meaning has an emotional effect that diverts the human mind with its experience and controls the heart and mind of an individual. To facilitate the understanding of this theo...
Read more

Abhijnana Shakuntalam (Act1-Act5)

-
  Act I Act 1 takes place in the forest on the foothills of the Himalayas and moves to the hermitage of the great sage Kanva, by the river Malini. The King Duhsanta appears, followed by his Charioteer, in hot pursuit of a deer, specifically a Blackbuck, which is a sacred animal. Duhsanta is stopped in his hunt by an ascetic who reminds him of his duty This deer is of the Hermitage, O King! He should not be killed…no…no…do not strike him down. How fragile the life of this deer! How cruel your sharp- pointed arrows, swift-winged! Never should they fall on his tender frame like tongues of flame on a heap of flowers. Quickly withdraw your well-aimed arrow, bound to protect the distressed, not strike the pure. (p. 173)   Furthermore, Duhsanta has entered the sacred Hermitage, where such slaughter is sacrilegious. At the ascetic surging, Duhsanta decides to go to the Hermitage of Kanva, to pay his respect as well enjoy the hospitality offered there. As they near the Hermitag...
Read more

Character Analysis of The Vicar

-
  Charles Primrose is not a flat character. With "human naturalness" the Vicar repeatedly surprises the reader by his inconsistency. He has no one personality trait without possessing, at least to a small degree, its opposite. The Vicar is a preacher, and to a great extent he acts and speaks in accordance with his sermons. His inconsistencies arise from the fact that he "unites in himself the three greatest characters upon earth: he is a priest, a husbandman, and the father of a family. When the duties attached to these occupations come into conflict, the reader may expect to find the Vicar inconsistent. Amiability is a prominent characteristic of which the Vicar boasts. Speaking of himself and his family, he says, "There was in fact, nothing that could make us angry with the world or each other.(1)"   He demonstrates this quality by his act of intercession for the butler who, masquerading as the owner of the home in which he worked, had duped the Vicar into...
Read more